Crazy Horse, A True American essays

Crazy Horse, A True American essays "A very great vision is needed and the man who has it must follow it as the eagle seeks the deepest blue of the sky. I was hostile to the white man...we preferred hunting to a life of idleness on our reservations. At times we did not get enough to eat and we were not allowed to hunt. All we wanted was peace and to be left alone. Soldiers came and destroyed our villages. Then Long Hair (Custer) came...They say we massacred him, but he would have done the same to us. Our first impulse was to escape but we were so hemmed in we Crazy Horse, as Remembered by Ohiyesa I chose to write about Crazy Horse because he is a man who suffered for the cause of freedom from genocide and oppression. He was a warrior for justice. Crazy Horse did not have an equal as a warrior or a chief. He gave submissive allegiance to no man, white or Indian, and claimed his inalienable rights, as an Indian, to wander at will over the hunting grounds of his people. He never registered at any agency; never touched a pen; never signed a treaty and refused to allow any photographs to be taken of him. He wanted only peace and a way of living for his people without having to live on the white man's reservations. Crazy Horse (Tashunkewitko) was born on the Republican River about 1845. He was killed at Fort Robinson, Nebraska, in 1877, so that he lived barely thirty-three years. He was an uncommonly handsome man. It is said that Crazy Horse was physically perfect, like an Apollo. He was modest and courteous, but was a born warrior. However, he was a gentle warrior, a true brave, who stood for the highest ideals of the Sioux. Biased historians have misconstrued facts surrounding Crazy Horse. It is only fair to judge a man by the estimate of his own people rather than that of his enemies. Crazy Horse earned his reputation among the Lakota not only by his skill and daring in battle but also by his fierce determination to preserv...

Free Essays on Turners Early And Late Works

â€Å"The work of Joseph Mallard William Turner represents a unique phenomenon in the history of painting: the successive achievement of two diametrically opposed styles of expression, implying a radical transformation of the sense of perception, the first style based on the continuation of an esthetic past, the second providing an example of a vision whose revolutionary power would be revealed in the time to come† (Selz 5). Looking at Turner’s early work and then looking at his later work is like looking at two very different artists. Turner was accepted as a â€Å"†¦technical revolutionary, as a prophetic visionary. Certainly he anticipated much in twentieth century painting, from impressionism to abstract color experimentation† (Lindsay front page). His work spans many years and changes from very classical landscapes to landscapes that make the eye travel through with the use of light and color to express emotion and feeling. Turner was born in London on April 23, 1775. He was the son of a barber and came from humble beginnings. His mother died when he was very young. He started drawing when he was very young; some of his drawings were done at twelve years old. He learned to draw by coping work others. By the time he was fourteen, he began the practise he continued all his life. He would travel during the summer months notes his way through the English countryside and through Europe. He would make notes from nature in pencil or watercolor, which he used afterward as material for his paintings. His main source of influence and encouragement, in his early years, came from Dr. Munro, who used to invite Turner, Girtin, and other young artists to his house and he would allow them to copy his collection of watercolors by J.R. Cozens (Chamot 5). Early on Turner revealed, through his works ‘Fisherman at Sea’ and ‘Moonlight: a Study of Millbank,’ that he had a sensitive eye for color, even in dark night scenes. H... Free Essays on Turner's Early And Late Works Free Essays on Turner's Early And Late Works â€Å"The work of Joseph Mallard William Turner represents a unique phenomenon in the history of painting: the successive achievement of two diametrically opposed styles of expression, implying a radical transformation of the sense of perception, the first style based on the continuation of an esthetic past, the second providing an example of a vision whose revolutionary power would be revealed in the time to come† (Selz 5). Looking at Turner’s early work and then looking at his later work is like looking at two very different artists. Turner was accepted as a â€Å"†¦technical revolutionary, as a prophetic visionary. Certainly he anticipated much in twentieth century painting, from impressionism to abstract color experimentation† (Lindsay front page). His work spans many years and changes from very classical landscapes to landscapes that make the eye travel through with the use of light and color to express emotion and feeling. Turner was born in London on April 23, 1775. He was the son of a barber and came from humble beginnings. His mother died when he was very young. He started drawing when he was very young; some of his drawings were done at twelve years old. He learned to draw by coping work others. By the time he was fourteen, he began the practise he continued all his life. He would travel during the summer months notes his way through the English countryside and through Europe. He would make notes from nature in pencil or watercolor, which he used afterward as material for his paintings. His main source of influence and encouragement, in his early years, came from Dr. Munro, who used to invite Turner, Girtin, and other young artists to his house and he would allow them to copy his collection of watercolors by J.R. Cozens (Chamot 5). Early on Turner revealed, through his works ‘Fisherman at Sea’ and ‘Moonlight: a Study of Millbank,’ that he had a sensitive eye for color, even in dark night scenes. H...